From: ayub mohammed <mdayyub@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:24 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] NO more Dantewadas please untill u clarify my Seven Basic Questions to u all Maoists in India
To: Bahujan@yahoogroups.com, bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com, baseerah@yahoogroups.com, "beautifulindia@yahoogroups.com" <beautifulindia@yahoogroups.com>, borderlessworld@yahoogroups.com, "c_b_i@yahoogroups.co.in" <c_b_i@yahoogroups.co.in>, cmkp_pk@yahoogroups.com, crystalclearforum@yahoogroups.com, dailysouthasian@yahoogroups.com, Dr Ali Ashgar <doctor_aliasghar@yahoo.com>, "Dr. Awatar S. Sekhon" <assekhon@shaw.ca>, global-geopolitics@yahoogroups.com, global-money@yahoogroups.com, global-right-path@googlegroups.com, globalization_roads@yahoogroups.com, globalobserver@yahoogroups.com, godhra786@yahoogroups.com, govtwatch4@yahoogroups.com, Greenpeace.india@mailing.greenpeace.org, Humane-Rights-Agenda@yahoogroups.com, honestly-concerned-special-notices@yahoogroups.com, IHRO <ihro@yahoogroups.com>, libertarian@yahoogroups.com, loksatta_initiative@yahoogroups.com, newage@yahoo.com, newworldordercorner_2@yahoogroups.com, new wave <new.wave.nw@gmail.com>, nextnewworld@yahoogroups.com, "net-fellows@yahoogroups.com" <net-fellows@yahoogroups.com>
| Just I want to get clarification from this group on the following basic questions about, Marxism, Leninism, and Maoism, 1)Do u accept all the writings of Engel/Marx, Lenin, Stalin and finally moa in general, as a consolidated philosophy of Maoist parties in the world globally? 2)Do u want to implement all the Marxism, Leninism, Stalinist, and Maoism in the world without considering the natures of the different states? 3) Naxalbari was started in W.Bengal and did not gain any control over any area since 70's. And Andhra Pradesh the area of People's War was regarded and hundred and thousands were killed, in mid-eighties to mid-nineties now declared the entire is as peace zone except Khammam district. It means rise and fall is the original nature of any Marxist, or Maoist party's practicality in which thousands of people were died and are still dieing. Is it the way of Marxists to not to review the past acts retrospectively for the future program and for the betterment of the people? 4)Totality is the principle to assess the prospects of the party in future and the people would like to come into fold, Partial win over through a weak moment of the police in Dante Wada is not a good sign for u all in assessing the strength and weakness of the Maoist party. In totality the Maoist party has lost thousands of lives in Andhra Pradesh. and wiped out from the map of Andhra Pradesh. And in earlier stage of its emergence the same was happened in W,Bengal. So in totality you lost thousands and u killed just hundreds comparatively. In comparative study, Dante Wada is a small in number of deaths u claimed, that u won the war, but, I say u lost the war before start of the real and original war. Because, i have no idea of your declaration of your policy before the people in legal ways, legally, Because Lenin had clarified about the balance of acts in legal and in underground level. Roads, water, health, education, communication, and other basic needs in general every human being wants. Your bases and activities are confined to such areas where all these are not available. Consequently, the government of India, and the states of Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa, W.Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashta in co-operation with each other, would provide all those facilities to such remote areas where only your cadre can have access and nobody would be allowed. What will be the next before you all? It means rise and decline? Then why these are rise and fall in India? 4)'Absolute idea' is only an absolute abstraction from motion by which all the combinations and all the states of matter are produced" is the description of Marxism clarified by George Plekhanove in his article 'Dialectics and Logic' which was published in 1928, by International Publishers, New York. I like to put this interpretation, to ask you all that u need to read the Marxism, Leninism, and Maoism, for the philosophical applications based on the strong base of strong national philosophy. Of course, a question is still unresolved, why did they keep up the interest of their states during their life times of Lenin, Stalin in Russia and moa in china? 5) Why does not u like to come through the Indian ness and its patriotism to serve the people? do not u have Indian philosophy applicable in continuation of Marxism, Leninism, Maoism on any name under which u r all working in disguise and following like a blind men to the other models of Russia china, and partially Nepal 6) Is not it a bankruptcy of the political philosophy? 7)No more Dante wads please until and unless u come out with all these questions i asked to u all in the interest of the people of poor tribal and the poor police personnel in India I understand, this group has no such practice to answer all these questions which may appear all in negative question to u all. However i expect the answers from the responsible persons of the party in the interest of Indian people.
I sincerely suggest u all need more finding on Marxism, Leninism, and Maoism against of what u call revisionism which had no more interest in the capitalism if u say it as revisionism but the inability of sustained within the tight frame-up have been in fix on the weak foundation of basic principles of Marxism, Consequently, the same mistakes were happened in Leninism and finally settled in Maoism. It means where it was collapsed. u all wanted to build on the rubbles of political philosophy of Marxism, Leninism and Maoism again and again as a routine to cause a benefit to the ruling political parties in India. It is not the correct way.
Ayub Mohammed http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_analysts/
|
--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment