Fwd: [bangla-vision] Khalistan's Declaration Of Independence From India Is Legal

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Habib Yousafzai <habibyousafzai@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:45 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Khalistan's Declaration Of Independence From India Is Legal

 

Khalistan's Declaration Of Independence From India Is Legal

Habib Yousafzai

 

The Sikhs of Punjab (Khalistan) are struggling for their Sovereignty, Independence and Political Power since 14th March, 1849, without any disruption. The situation became worse when the 'Brahmins-Hindus, Incorporation,'robbed the Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, on15th August 1947; the day India received freedom from British. Recently, the Hindu-Brahmins Indian government has launched another trick by preparing a black list of the Sikh Diaspora who in their eyes are extremists or terrorists. Irony of the case is that out of this list of 169 peoples they want to delist 46 of them. It has also been noted that most of these 46 people have been living in Punjab. The question comes to mind, why the Sikh nation would beg before Indian government of its permission to go back in their own homeland? If they demanded a separate homeland they did not break any laws while Indian Supreme Court's ruling says that demanding Khalistan peacefully is no crime. Therefore, Sikh nation must 'reject' the' Listing and Delisting' of Sikhs and they must not be cheated once again by the Indian democracy of the 'Brahmins-Hindus', Inc.

 It is a well known fact that the Indian government, the so called biggest democracy of the world, is fraud. Even Dr. Manmohan Singh who acts like a robot of Sonia Gandhi, is an agent of 'Brahmins-Hindus' autocracy, unelected member of Indian Lok Sabha or parliament, and has failed badly in his mission when he 'begged' the United States and Canadian administrations that the 'Sikh Diaspora's activities alias Sikh extremists be curbed.'Does this mean that the 'foreign administrations' should take instructions from the 'Brahmins-Hindus, Inc, as how to run affairs of their country? Is it not the interference of the 'Brahmins-Hindus, Inc., in other country(ies) affairs?

In June1984, Hindu-Brahmins Indian government  murdered 260,000 innocent Sikhs in an 'undeclared' war in the form of a brutal military "Operation Bluestar'of June, 1984 as per the figures presented by The Politics of Genocide by Inderjeet Singh Jaijee; press releases of the Council of Khalistan ( www.khalistannews.com).  On 26th January, 1986, five members of the Panthak Committee nominated by the Sarbat Khalsa institution of the Sikh nation, Punjab, fulfilled the most cherished dream of the Sikhs (by this declaration) of 'Khalistan' as an independent state. On this auspicious day, from the Darbar Sahib and the Supreme Seat of Sikh Polity, The Akal Takht Sahib, it was (on behalf of the five member Panthak Committee) declared before all the States/Governments and notified to them that from this day onwards, the Khalsa Panth would have its own Home,'Khalistan'. The decision was taken as the Hindu-Brahmins crossed all the limits and when the 'Brahmins-Hindus' alleged Indian democracy attacked militarily the Darbar Sahib Complex and The Akal Takht Sahib. The 'undeclared' war in the form of "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, mercilessly martyred Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa (Bhindranwale) in particular, and the Sikhs indiscriminately. Recently, U N courts ruled that Kosovo's declaration is legal as per the newspaper report below.

The  National Post Toronto reported under 'Independence Ruled Legal' on July23, 2010. UN judges said yesterday "Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia did not violate international law", in a ruling that could trigger demands for recognition from other secessionist states. The International Court of Justice (IJC) in The Hague rejected a Serbian attempt to have it declared an illegal state by saying it had not broken any conventions when it established independence two years.

 

Serbia condemned the ruling and said it would "never" recognize the predominantly Muslim territory as church bells were sounded across the nation in protest.

 

The U.S. State Department welcomed the verdict and called on European states to support Kosovo. Joe Biden, the Vice-President of the United States, called to Boris Tadic, Serbia's President, to demand Belgrade co-operate with the verdict.

 

Russia and China have refused to recognize Kosovo and fear the verdict will trigger a rash of demands for recognition in other areas. There are breakaway republics in Cyprus, Georgia, Moldova and Azerbaijan that could now seize upon the ruling.

 

Other countries including China, Spain, Canada and Russia also contain self-governing territories that could now attempt to declare independence and demand international recognition.

 

Land locked Kosovo, with two million inhabitants -- 90% of them ethnic Albanians of mainly Muslim belief--unilaterally declared independence from predominantly Christian Orthodox Serbia two years ago, after UN-brokered negotiations to resolve its future status failed.

 

More than 10,000 ethnic Albanians and hundreds of Serbs were killed in a civil war after the break-up of Yugoslavia in the 1990s.

 

A 78-day NATO bombing campaign against Serbia in retaliation for two years of attacks on the province's ethnic Albanian majority was launched in 1999. After a Serbian capitulation, a UN administration and NATO troops were installed to monitor a ceasefire.

 

A total of 69, mainly Western countries, including Canada, the United States and Britain, have recognized Kosovo. The state is likely to garner up to 40 more diplomatic partners in the wake of the ruling. That would be enough to join the UN though its application could still be vetoed.

 

"The decision finally removes all doubts that countries which still do not recognize the republic of Kosovo could have," said Fatmir Sejdiu, the President of Kosovo.

 

While the international court endorsed the Kosovo declaration of independence, it did not set out a guide to how other breakaway territories could achieve international legitimacy.

 

"The court considers that general international law contains no applicable prohibition of declaration of independence," said Judge Hisashi Owada, president of the ICJ.

 

"Accordingly, it concludes that the declaration of independence of Feb. 17, 2008, did not violate general international law."

 

Belgrade said it would continue to campaign against the recognition of Kosovo.

 

Vuk Jeremic, the Serbian Foreign Minister, said the court had failed to defend international law. He warned that the ruling could trigger a violent backlash from the remaining Serbian residents of the territory but, said Belgrade, remained ready for negotiations.

Keeping in view of the above facts, it is the right time for the Sikh nation to form their own government and begin functioning in Khalistan. The Sikh leaders who have been repeatedly harassed, to put behind bars and released, the Sikh academics, the Sikh Diaspora must understand the ball game of the 'Brahmins-Hindus, Inc, and let the world know that "they had been a sovereign and secular nation, 1799 to 14th March, 1849, and they have to come out of the clutches of the deceitful and apartheid practicing 'Brahmins-Hindus, Inc., with immediate effect. Without 'sovereignty and independence', the Sikhs cannot survive in the 'occupation of the Brahmins-Hindus alleged Indian democracy. Similarly, the people of the internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, Assam and its 7-sister, Tamil, etc., must come out the 'tight control' of the alleged Indian democracy, to control their own destiny.

 

__._,_.___

--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/